Search:

security camera equipment mini security camera security camera reviews security camera information security camera sales home surveillance cameras surveillance cameras systems spy camera wireless

Security Camera Equipment

The Pentagon Security Camera on 911 (Part 2)

Security Camera Equipment Site
Security Camera Equipment Site Security Camera Equipment Site
Security Camera Equipment Site

Is that really Flight 77 in the Pentagon security camera?

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: January 1, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Author: muzicmaker2001

Length: 06:15
Rating: 4.16
Views: 46077

Tags: 77  9/11  911  camera  conspiracy  flight  pentagon  security  tower  trade  wtc  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

GSpotter63 (August 20, 2008 at 5:16 am)
Sorry! But this vid is completely incorrect. If you want the truth, take a quick look at this vid "Car with Jet engine Airshow (1 of 2)" just copy and paste into the search window of YouTube. It shows a jet car. The white smoke is the result of adding to much fuel into the engine in a short time, something that an inexperienced pilot (hijacker) could easily do in a moment of panic just before death.
mskydolphin (August 19, 2008 at 6:56 am)
This is closeThe research is in on, the truth and the lies of,"The powers, 9/11, 7/7, Cover-ups, Chips,Schools, The Mass Media."May be alarming and some views may seem outrageous ie: reptilians(big deal), But the facts are the facts. Lose the fear and look. Then, Keep your eyes open. Go to:Google Video series Parts 1, 2-(9/11)& 3,David Icke - Freedom to Fascism part 1*Waking up is hardbut worth it.
AweSomo84 (August 18, 2008 at 7:59 pm)
because there was no plane
AweSomo84 (August 18, 2008 at 7:59 pm)
Nop if its was a plane it would have exploded when the plane would hit a light pole . Wake up,Peace
GSpotter63 (August 17, 2008 at 3:55 pm)
I was referring to the comment in the vid calming that white smoke is proof that it was a missile. When in reality white smoke from a turbo jet engine is quite possible and proves absolutely nothing; except maybe his lack of knowledge, or his intent on pushing his agenda regardless of the facts.
GSpotter63 (August 17, 2008 at 3:46 pm)
OK, let's try a little experiment with a fully loaded and fueled jumbo jet tipping the scales at over 170,000 Lb. and ram it at a building at 500 MPH. E=MC^2. Energy = mass times velocity squared. That means your 170,000 Lb. plane now has well over 200,000,000 Lb. of force. You can say good bye to the steel beams glass panels and concrete walls! At 500 mph a straw can go through a tree. Sorry, but reality dose not conform itself to your beliefs.
Poonard (August 16, 2008 at 2:27 pm)
ive not seen a clearly visable video of the 757...i do my own research. i obviously wouldn't be here if i weren't. i am constrained however by the internet, i am not able to get to a congressional library or find video of the clear 757 shot...if your interested in the truth..show me the video...if you have the proof..i would LOVE to be sure that im wrong in my opinion..
muzicmaker2001 (August 16, 2008 at 12:53 pm)
So, the obvious question is where are these missing frames? Why are you so lucky to have seen the entire footage? Is there a shot of a 757 even approaching the Pentagon? Camera phone...anything? It seems you are the only one who has seen the plane, but somehow think I should believe you without evidence?
BillforSara (August 15, 2008 at 11:29 pm)
Buh Bye means yor an absolute Fucking Moron and don't realize there is missing frames from this so called Film. I have seen the entire footage Jack ass so don't try and get all Uppidy with me. If you want to remain a Fucking Idiot, then you have the freedom to do so. I know what I have seen and what is missing from this film. Beleive what you want, just don't push it on me and tell me to see something else. Don't piss on My back and tell me it's raining. Dipshit.
muzicmaker2001 (August 15, 2008 at 9:19 pm)
So, "Buh bye" means there is no footage where a 757 is clearly visible?

Security Camera Equipment Site © 2007 All Rights Reserved.