Horjan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

And were these hijackers on the passanger-list?

streetfightsecrets (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Is there gonna be any new hard evidence pointing at "inside job"?"for example: 3 of the 11 supposed suicidal hijakcers identified on the FBI website have since come forward and said "hey,um, Im not a hijacker and also... Im not dead!" its on the BBC news website!that is pretty hard evidence- they are not dead... they are alive.Anyway, Im not out to convince anyone- nice to keep an open mind.

Horjan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Lol, we'll see in a few years then. Inconsistencies in the official story, you will probably laugh at me, but no, there are some inconsistencies regarding for example the collapses, but nothing major. There are coincidences on the other hand. Ask yourself how many think it was not an inside job? Think they will suddenly change their minds? Is there gonna be any new hard evidence pointing at "inside job"? hell no. Don't get me started on the inconsistencies of the inside job theory

streetfightsecrets (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

how many people believe 911 was an inside job? millionsin the next few years the people who believe the official story will be seen as the "earth is flat" brigadeyou say you believe in the truth- so do you not admit there are at least some inconsistencies in the official story? nothing suspicious to your mind? no doubt?search "the day before 9/11" on utube- rumsfeld was on the verge of bubbling the pentagon for misappropriating TRILLIONS of US tax payers money!! Coincidence?

Horjan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I believe in the truth, until I have a good reason to think otherwise. How many do you think know about this? Please give an estimate number

feedbacksol (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

kafir, I like how you come in a 9-11 truth preSentation and then so quickly attack people who agree with the conspiracies with such childish attacks. To write off the evidence presented as a joke and nutty is pissing on the graves of all the victims from the war on terror to 9-11 itself. Either you're mentally ill or just evil to the core. Give my regards to SATAN as you fry in hell for attacking GOOD people who want the truth.

zephranna01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

basically the people involved in the cover up, know if they come out publically, they will soon die in some accident, usually 'suicide.'And even if they did, they would have ahard time being heard through the NWO run media, and also the average American is not going to believe them anyway, or at least prefer not to.Its the NWO's ace up the sleeve, the sheer unbelievableness of it, something so huge and evil, a daily part of our everyday lives.

streetfightsecrets (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

point 2- simple question, is it REALLY necessary to have over 100 people involved? Think about it. Is it possible this could of been pulled off by fewer? The right people in the right places? I think so.My personal opinion is that many many people were involved and many many more are FULLY AWARE that 911 was inside job- but for the sake of reasoned argument I felt I should challenge the "more than 100 would have to be in on it" comment you left.Do you really believe the official story?

streetfightsecrets (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

point 1- literally thousands of people may well be involved- when you benefit from the crime or are afraid of dire consequences to your family there is no worry about "leaking"... and if someone on the inside does "leak" you just deride them as another conspiracy nut or kill them. Simple to control really.

streetfightsecrets (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Horjan (1 week ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as the theory would be true, more than 100 people would be in on it, firefighters, al-qaeda, the government, rescue workers, the police, the media, larry silverstein ++. It's just ridiulous:P "I did hit reply but its come up out of sequence, dont know why, soory about that- the argument is the "loads of people would have to be involved to make it work" argument is the argument Im referring to... post continued...